pasupuleti
03-06 11:10 PM
http://www.isnamerica.org
There is nothing going on with isnamerica.
There is nothing going on with isnamerica.
wallpaper funny friends quotes. funny
Almond
07-05 11:55 AM
You'd have to reapply for I140 for the new company. The one you had approved for the old company will not be valid for the new company.
paskal
08-14 02:54 PM
does it reaaaally matter?
7 am, 8.02 am, 10.55 am....
what's the difference?
this is a request to you NOT to open a new thread for every mailroom guy in USCIS. there are plenty of threads tracking the receipts, what is wrong with using them? do we really need to divide ourselves on different threads by who signed the fedex receipt???
7 am, 8.02 am, 10.55 am....
what's the difference?
this is a request to you NOT to open a new thread for every mailroom guy in USCIS. there are plenty of threads tracking the receipts, what is wrong with using them? do we really need to divide ourselves on different threads by who signed the fedex receipt???
2011 funny gay quotes. funny friend
stupendousman11
12-04 03:31 PM
I have usually asked my HR to give me a letter covering the following details in the employment letter to avoid unnecessary questions at POE:
Name
Designation
Location
Salary
Job responsibilities/description
Employed as H1
Indication that you are out of the country for a short time and intend to come back to rejoin the company
Name
Designation
Location
Salary
Job responsibilities/description
Employed as H1
Indication that you are out of the country for a short time and intend to come back to rejoin the company
more...
vayumahesh
03-12 12:28 PM
Here you go ... (for INDIA and Most Other Countries)
Cut Off Dates- Consulate General of the United States Mumbai, India (http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html)
Immigrant Visas
Cut-Off Dates for Immigrant Visas
We are pleased to announce the April 2010 cut-off dates for immigrant visas for individuals born in India and those born in most other countries.
To qualify for an appointment, an applicant's priority date (the date that the petition was filed) must fall before the cut-off date for the appropriate category.
The following numbers are derived from the Department of State's Visa Bulletin. If you have additional questions about cut-off dates and your case is being processed at the U.S. Consulate General in Mumbai, please e-mail us or call us at +91-22-2363-7407 between 2 and 4 p.m. IST.
Category India Most Other Countries
F1 8 July 2004 8 July 2004
FX 1 Jan 2005 1 Jan 2005
F2A 1 June 2006 1 June 2006
F2B 1 March 2002 1 March 2002
F3 22 May 2001 22 May 2001
F4 1 March 2000 1 March 2000
E1 Current Current
E2 1 February 2005 Current
E3 8 September 2001 1 February 2003
EW 1 June 2001 1 June 2001
E4 Current Current
E4-Religious Current Current
Cut Off Dates- Consulate General of the United States Mumbai, India (http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html)
Immigrant Visas
Cut-Off Dates for Immigrant Visas
We are pleased to announce the April 2010 cut-off dates for immigrant visas for individuals born in India and those born in most other countries.
To qualify for an appointment, an applicant's priority date (the date that the petition was filed) must fall before the cut-off date for the appropriate category.
The following numbers are derived from the Department of State's Visa Bulletin. If you have additional questions about cut-off dates and your case is being processed at the U.S. Consulate General in Mumbai, please e-mail us or call us at +91-22-2363-7407 between 2 and 4 p.m. IST.
Category India Most Other Countries
F1 8 July 2004 8 July 2004
FX 1 Jan 2005 1 Jan 2005
F2A 1 June 2006 1 June 2006
F2B 1 March 2002 1 March 2002
F3 22 May 2001 22 May 2001
F4 1 March 2000 1 March 2000
E1 Current Current
E2 1 February 2005 Current
E3 8 September 2001 1 February 2003
EW 1 June 2001 1 June 2001
E4 Current Current
E4-Religious Current Current
rbashir
02-15 08:23 PM
Hi Guys,
As always thanks for all of your help who are out there and lending a hand to each other in this immigration mess.
After denial of I-140 (EB3) in November of 2007 in response to my A2P RFE, I filled for appeal in December 2007. Now my case is in appeal with AAO. My H1b is expiring in June 2008. I am hoping to get an extension based on my pending appeal.
In the meantime, another company has offered me a job and agreed to file the labor of my behalf. In the current situation of mine, where appeal is pending, which will take a long time for the final decision, my lawyer suggested to file the new labor through that company and this time under EB2 catagory. I dont have masters degree but I have BS computer science and now more than 5 years of US experience. He suggested EB2 since for my home country EB2 is always current.
I just want to get an opinion for all of you about this situation of mine, and filing labor under Eb2 cat under PERM. The position in the new company is Senior Security Analyst and requires Masters degree or 5 years of experience.
Also , what is the process of getting extension on H1b while appeal is pending and how early should I file the extension before June 2008.
I did post another thread related to the last issue regarding the H1 extension here
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=17377
I apologize for this, I should have remove that one but am unable to find the delete option
Thanks in Advance
RB
As always thanks for all of your help who are out there and lending a hand to each other in this immigration mess.
After denial of I-140 (EB3) in November of 2007 in response to my A2P RFE, I filled for appeal in December 2007. Now my case is in appeal with AAO. My H1b is expiring in June 2008. I am hoping to get an extension based on my pending appeal.
In the meantime, another company has offered me a job and agreed to file the labor of my behalf. In the current situation of mine, where appeal is pending, which will take a long time for the final decision, my lawyer suggested to file the new labor through that company and this time under EB2 catagory. I dont have masters degree but I have BS computer science and now more than 5 years of US experience. He suggested EB2 since for my home country EB2 is always current.
I just want to get an opinion for all of you about this situation of mine, and filing labor under Eb2 cat under PERM. The position in the new company is Senior Security Analyst and requires Masters degree or 5 years of experience.
Also , what is the process of getting extension on H1b while appeal is pending and how early should I file the extension before June 2008.
I did post another thread related to the last issue regarding the H1 extension here
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=17377
I apologize for this, I should have remove that one but am unable to find the delete option
Thanks in Advance
RB
more...
yyfGC98
05-19 12:49 PM
I need help on my I485 pending case:
When I was a PHD student I filled NIW (national interest waiver) and got my I-140 approval (priority date is 6/22/2006). Now I am working for a Telecommunication company.
My NIW I-140 form stated my job is:
SOC Code: 17-2112
Nontechnical description of job: Operations research and logistics with optimization and numerical analysis.
In my NIW cover letter, I stated my contribution in airline industry with the operations research and optimization knowledge. My current work is still related to the operations research and logistics but my contribution is different now. Does that mean I am not in the same research/work field? Some attorney said my I-485 will most probably be denied because I am not benefit to airline industry now. Is this true?
What is the definition of the same/similar field? I thought I should be safe as long as I continue to work on OR and logistics related work, even if my work on different project or for different companies.
When USCIS process I-485, they will look at the job description on I-140 form or the contribution in cover letter?
An attorney suggested me to apply a PERM as a backup to keep the existing priority date (6/22/06), in case my NIW-based 485 case has any issue.
What's the percentage of chance that you think my 485 can be denied due to the working field issue? I originally thought it's very small (less than 5%), and I just need to wait for the Visa availability. Is it correct?
My husband's H1 visa is about to reach the 6 year limit in March 2011, and he was thinking to use EAD from my 485 case until we get green card. Is this a good plan, or he need to apply a PERM as a backup too? Is it too late? What would be a good plan?
When I was a PHD student I filled NIW (national interest waiver) and got my I-140 approval (priority date is 6/22/2006). Now I am working for a Telecommunication company.
My NIW I-140 form stated my job is:
SOC Code: 17-2112
Nontechnical description of job: Operations research and logistics with optimization and numerical analysis.
In my NIW cover letter, I stated my contribution in airline industry with the operations research and optimization knowledge. My current work is still related to the operations research and logistics but my contribution is different now. Does that mean I am not in the same research/work field? Some attorney said my I-485 will most probably be denied because I am not benefit to airline industry now. Is this true?
What is the definition of the same/similar field? I thought I should be safe as long as I continue to work on OR and logistics related work, even if my work on different project or for different companies.
When USCIS process I-485, they will look at the job description on I-140 form or the contribution in cover letter?
An attorney suggested me to apply a PERM as a backup to keep the existing priority date (6/22/06), in case my NIW-based 485 case has any issue.
What's the percentage of chance that you think my 485 can be denied due to the working field issue? I originally thought it's very small (less than 5%), and I just need to wait for the Visa availability. Is it correct?
My husband's H1 visa is about to reach the 6 year limit in March 2011, and he was thinking to use EAD from my 485 case until we get green card. Is this a good plan, or he need to apply a PERM as a backup too? Is it too late? What would be a good plan?
2010 images of friendship quotes.
auvrm
05-18 06:18 PM
(I'm a new member to this forum)
My H1B extension was approved for only 6 months, based on the SOW (Client Contract) end date (rather than the usual 3 year extension).
I would be just about in my maternity leave for the pregnancy during the petition expiry and if my further extension is denied (god forbid), I was told that I would be terminated from my employers' payroll and I have to leave the country or change my status to Student, Visitor etc.
FYI: I'm working for this company since Oct 2005.
Is there any law that prohibits termination of a worker during her PREGNANCY DISABILITY LEAVE (MATERNITY LEAVE) Or FMLA (Family and Medical Leave) on the basis that the USCIS didn't approve the petition (god forbid)?
My H1B extension was approved for only 6 months, based on the SOW (Client Contract) end date (rather than the usual 3 year extension).
I would be just about in my maternity leave for the pregnancy during the petition expiry and if my further extension is denied (god forbid), I was told that I would be terminated from my employers' payroll and I have to leave the country or change my status to Student, Visitor etc.
FYI: I'm working for this company since Oct 2005.
Is there any law that prohibits termination of a worker during her PREGNANCY DISABILITY LEAVE (MATERNITY LEAVE) Or FMLA (Family and Medical Leave) on the basis that the USCIS didn't approve the petition (god forbid)?
more...
Blog Feeds
09-10 07:50 PM
Hunton Immigration and Nationality Law Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
On July 1, 2010, the Vital Statistics Office of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico began issuing new, more secure Puerto Rican birth certificates to US Citizens born in Puerto Rico. As of October 1, 2010, all certified copies of Puerto Rican birth certificates issued prior to July 1, 2010, will no longer be valid. Accordingly, the Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a press release providing guidance to US employers with regard to the I-9 process. For new employees, employers may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates through September 30, 2010; after that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates (issued on or after July 1, 2010) we be acceptable for I-9 purposes. Therefore, as of October 1, 2010, employers must pay close attention to the issuance date of Puerto Rican birth certificates presented for I-9 purposes.
For existing employees, there is no need to re-verify the employment authorization of employees who previously presented pre-July 1, 2010, Puerto Rican birth certificates. Federal Contractors subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation E-Verify clause may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates prior to October 1, 2010, but beginning on that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates issued on or after July 1, 2010, will be acceptable. Federal Contractors may not ask for the newer version during I-9 reverification of those individuals who previously presented the older version of the Puerto Rican birth certificates.
The USCIS memo can be found here (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=45e3285ca77fa210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD).
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~4/25g-Wwo_N40
More... (http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~3/25g-Wwo_N40/)
On July 1, 2010, the Vital Statistics Office of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico began issuing new, more secure Puerto Rican birth certificates to US Citizens born in Puerto Rico. As of October 1, 2010, all certified copies of Puerto Rican birth certificates issued prior to July 1, 2010, will no longer be valid. Accordingly, the Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a press release providing guidance to US employers with regard to the I-9 process. For new employees, employers may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates through September 30, 2010; after that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates (issued on or after July 1, 2010) we be acceptable for I-9 purposes. Therefore, as of October 1, 2010, employers must pay close attention to the issuance date of Puerto Rican birth certificates presented for I-9 purposes.
For existing employees, there is no need to re-verify the employment authorization of employees who previously presented pre-July 1, 2010, Puerto Rican birth certificates. Federal Contractors subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation E-Verify clause may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates prior to October 1, 2010, but beginning on that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates issued on or after July 1, 2010, will be acceptable. Federal Contractors may not ask for the newer version during I-9 reverification of those individuals who previously presented the older version of the Puerto Rican birth certificates.
The USCIS memo can be found here (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=45e3285ca77fa210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD).
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~4/25g-Wwo_N40
More... (http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~3/25g-Wwo_N40/)
hair funny friendship quotes with
himu73
07-03 10:34 AM
If for a moment we say USCIS has really increased the processing rate and more people are getting green cards which we see is the case. It may signal that on Oct 1st,2007 dates will move ahead of what was the scenario in May visa bulletin.
If we forget the mistake they did in July bulletin and see the brighter side that they process faster, we should hold back our applications now and wait for the scenario on Oct 1st 2007, which would be hopefully a give a good realistic forward movement in dates. Since receipt date is important we should not get emotional and send in the application. This is just a thought.
Making Current in July was anyway like a lottery which denied all calculations based on pending cases.Before getting into law suits and protests which are also needed we have to take stock of all the implications and whether we really can provide 100% to these efforts.
From the posts coming since yesterday, most of the members are agitated and it seems we fail to realize that this event itself was a miscalculation and all of us were trying to get benefit of it considering the long waits we have endured for just getting a chance to file AOS.
We also knew that even if the applications are accepted there was no way we can get our green cards for a long time. AC21 and EAD for spouse was the main aim of many applicants.
This is really a sad story of people who have sacrificed career prospects, faced family separation, made important decisions like marraige.
Hope this post makes sense and we take a step back and reconsider our actions. This is not out of fear but past experience of lawsuits explained in other posts.
If we forget the mistake they did in July bulletin and see the brighter side that they process faster, we should hold back our applications now and wait for the scenario on Oct 1st 2007, which would be hopefully a give a good realistic forward movement in dates. Since receipt date is important we should not get emotional and send in the application. This is just a thought.
Making Current in July was anyway like a lottery which denied all calculations based on pending cases.Before getting into law suits and protests which are also needed we have to take stock of all the implications and whether we really can provide 100% to these efforts.
From the posts coming since yesterday, most of the members are agitated and it seems we fail to realize that this event itself was a miscalculation and all of us were trying to get benefit of it considering the long waits we have endured for just getting a chance to file AOS.
We also knew that even if the applications are accepted there was no way we can get our green cards for a long time. AC21 and EAD for spouse was the main aim of many applicants.
This is really a sad story of people who have sacrificed career prospects, faced family separation, made important decisions like marraige.
Hope this post makes sense and we take a step back and reconsider our actions. This is not out of fear but past experience of lawsuits explained in other posts.
more...
SunnySurya
07-27 01:49 PM
WandMaker,
Thanks for ur answer. I saw case posted by Loti_GC and his did not seem to be the case of two different I-140. That what got me concerned. When I called USCIS they declined to reveal this information,
EB2, if your I-140 approval reads as "Section: Mem of Profession w/Adv Deg, or of Exceptn'l Ability Sec.203(b) (2)" You should be worried only if you had two different 140 with the same employer. Take infopass and give a try, there is no standard procedure to find out.
Thanks for ur answer. I saw case posted by Loti_GC and his did not seem to be the case of two different I-140. That what got me concerned. When I called USCIS they declined to reveal this information,
EB2, if your I-140 approval reads as "Section: Mem of Profession w/Adv Deg, or of Exceptn'l Ability Sec.203(b) (2)" You should be worried only if you had two different 140 with the same employer. Take infopass and give a try, there is no standard procedure to find out.
hot funny friendship poems and
gcformeornot
09-24 07:17 PM
please......
more...
house funny friendship quotes and
munch_042
04-15 07:21 AM
I'm from the Philippines and Mar. 28, 2006 is my PD. My question now is, what if by June (by God's grace) my PD will be processed. How many more months should I wait before receiving my packet 4? considering that certain documents (ds230,nbi) need to be updated & be sent to them. A total of how many more months should I still need to wait before my embassy interview?
Hope u can really help me with this! thanks!
Hope u can really help me with this! thanks!
tattoo funny friends quotes.
gparr
January 8th, 2004, 07:53 PM
Here's an example of my first outing with my new lens, shooting birds in a nature preserve bird feeder area. I used a monopod on a cloudy day. I didn't realize how quick those little buggers can be. I shot manual and found the autofocus to be irritating at times. Any feedback on doing this kind of shooting would be appreciated.
Gary
This is the image fixed by Scott.
UBBCode:
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/153woodpecker2.jpg
Gary
This is the image fixed by Scott.
UBBCode:
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/153woodpecker2.jpg
more...
pictures Funny Friendship Quote
marcom10
04-20 12:57 AM
PS if you want a better laugh at that thing in my stamp IM me..southckid10..im on now :)
dresses funny est friends quotes and
neeidd
12-04 05:53 PM
Thanks Man :)
more...
makeup funny friends quotes and
neeidd
07-23 06:39 PM
Card production ordered
PD 03/2008
RD 8/10/2008
ND 9/20/2008
But my desi consulting company tells me it is safe to stay with them for another six months.
Edit:
PD is 3/2004 not 3/2008. Sorry about the confusion
Could you tell us in which service center your I-485 was?
PD 03/2008
RD 8/10/2008
ND 9/20/2008
But my desi consulting company tells me it is safe to stay with them for another six months.
Edit:
PD is 3/2004 not 3/2008. Sorry about the confusion
Could you tell us in which service center your I-485 was?
girlfriend funny friends quotes.
.jpg "funny friendship quotes")
Desertfox
11-03 05:05 PM
I don't think leave of absence nullify employer employee relationship. I checked this with my HR too when I was waiting for my EAD to be renewed. HR clearly told me that the only option was to terminate my employment in case my EAD was not renewed in time, and they would have opened the position and rehire me after receiving the physical EAD.
However, this is my personal opinion based on my personal experience.
However, this is my personal opinion based on my personal experience.
hairstyles makeup funny quotes for est
die_exquisita
07-07 04:42 AM
Hello,
Thanks for the reply!
So the letter is just an employment continuation or verification letter and has nothing that states the spousal details or spouse's intention to accompany the H1 holder. I hope I got that right.
Thanks again!
Thanks for the reply!
So the letter is just an employment continuation or verification letter and has nothing that states the spousal details or spouse's intention to accompany the H1 holder. I hope I got that right.
Thanks again!
permfiling
05-18 11:09 AM
If new position is similar in responsibilities, then no effect. but if the responsibilities are changing, I would recommend talking to your immigration lawyer about it
My LC and I-140 was approved with my ex-employer in CA.Now I have a oppurtunity to join my ex-employer in the east coast. Will I be able to file AOS if I join in a similar role and when my PD becomes current ? The immigration lawyer of my ex-employer told me that I have to join in the same location as my LC was approved to take advantage of AOS as it is location specific. Is it true?
Thanks
Member of north calif
dontation : $500
My LC and I-140 was approved with my ex-employer in CA.Now I have a oppurtunity to join my ex-employer in the east coast. Will I be able to file AOS if I join in a similar role and when my PD becomes current ? The immigration lawyer of my ex-employer told me that I have to join in the same location as my LC was approved to take advantage of AOS as it is location specific. Is it true?
Thanks
Member of north calif
dontation : $500
cel_tic
08-16 04:15 PM
Thanks deepimpact.
Appreciate your quick response. I checked with my travel agent and he said transit visa is not required for Germany. But I am getting different response from some others. By any chance do you know if the procedure still holds good.
Thanks
Appreciate your quick response. I checked with my travel agent and he said transit visa is not required for Germany. But I am getting different response from some others. By any chance do you know if the procedure still holds good.
Thanks
No comments:
Post a Comment