slideth3
01-22 05:53 AM
Hi Sam - your entry looks really nice. Unfortunately, this contest ended around 14 hours before you submitted your entry :( Therefore, your entry won't be eligible for the judging. I will add your entry to a mini-gallery on the main site once the contest ends though!
Yeah, read that it ended on the 20th a bit too late, thought I'd finish it anyway!
Cheers
Sam
Yeah, read that it ended on the 20th a bit too late, thought I'd finish it anyway!
Cheers
Sam
wallpaper justin bieber wallpaper 2011
illuminati
06-22 07:38 AM
Thanks for your update. Sorry about the LOE. Lately, I had been doing lot of project management. I meant RFE.
alparsons
November 8th, 2004, 10:11 PM
Hi,
I don't have direct personal experience with those particular lenses, however as a general rule suplementary lenses can be designed to give sharper results if they are designed to go in front of a particular lens. (the Nikon suplementary wide angle is probably slightly sharper) If it were me I would try the lenses I already have to see if the results I got from either or both were adequate for my personal purposes before I shelled out more bucks to change them. Even if they are terribly unsharp you may find that the exact look of the unsharpness is apealing in your images.
as far as a UV filter goes it is usualy a very subtle difference in the look of the images, unless you have a habit of destroying the front element of your lenses. If that were the case it could save you the cost of replaceing scratched lenses. Personaly I just make it a habit to keep my fingers off of the front of the glass, and so far in the last 30 or so years I haven't needed to keep a UV or skylight filter on my lenses.
I don't have direct personal experience with those particular lenses, however as a general rule suplementary lenses can be designed to give sharper results if they are designed to go in front of a particular lens. (the Nikon suplementary wide angle is probably slightly sharper) If it were me I would try the lenses I already have to see if the results I got from either or both were adequate for my personal purposes before I shelled out more bucks to change them. Even if they are terribly unsharp you may find that the exact look of the unsharpness is apealing in your images.
as far as a UV filter goes it is usualy a very subtle difference in the look of the images, unless you have a habit of destroying the front element of your lenses. If that were the case it could save you the cost of replaceing scratched lenses. Personaly I just make it a habit to keep my fingers off of the front of the glass, and so far in the last 30 or so years I haven't needed to keep a UV or skylight filter on my lenses.